Vancouver News

Canada to change regulations on oil tankers

By Dene Moore, The Canadian Press

VANCOUVER - With a decision expected next month on the contentious Northern Gateway pipeline through British Columbia, the federal government announced new measures Tuesday to strengthen its oil-spill response regime and placate a reluctant public.

Those changes include removing a $161-million cap on payouts from a national oil spill compensation fund and making the entire $400-million fund available to cover the costs of a marine spill.

"With these changes, Canada will have the most robust and comprehensive liability and compensation system for spills from ships anywhere in the world," Transport Minister Lisa Raitt said in Saint John, N.B., far from the eye of the oil tanker storm on the West Coast.

"We want to make sure that if there is a spill ... that it is not the Canadian taxpayer, that it is the polluter who pays at the end of the day."

The proposed changes failed to convert pipeline critics, who said the entire Canadian Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund wouldn't scratch the surface in a worst-case scenario spill off the B.C. coast.

"That's really not good enough," said Art Sterritt, executive director of Coastal First Nations, a coalition of aboriginal communities along the north and central B.C. coast that opposes the pipelines.

The changes offer no comfort to those concerned about the increased tanker traffic that would result from Northern Gateway or Kinder Morgan's proposed Trans Mountain pipeline through central B.C. to Port Metro Vancouver, he said.

The unlimited liability of the fund was one of 45 recommendations from an expert panel on tanker safety that reported last fall.

Raitt said up to $1.6 billion in total is available in compensation and to cover damages in the event of a spill through the ship owners' insurance, the domestic fund, and the international Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund. Both are funded by levies on the shipping industry.

If all of those funds are exhausted, the federal government would pay compensation and then recover the money from industry, she said.

Sterritt said taxpayers could still be on the hook.

But B.C. Environment Minister Mary Polak called the changes a significant step toward the "world-class" marine safety regime that is one of five conditions of provincial support for any oil pipeline project.

"There's a long way to go toward implementation but when you consider where we were at the beginning when we announced our five conditions, and where we are now — specifically with the federal government — we are feeling very pleased with the way in which they have worked toward our goals," Polak said in Victoria.

The $6.5-billion Northern Gateway project proposed by Calgary-based Enbridge (TSX:ENB) would transport about 525,000 barrels a day of diluted bitumen from the Alberta oil sands to the northern B.C. coast.

The $5.4-billion Trans Mountain expansion proposed by Texas-based Kinder Morgan would almost triple the current capacity to Port Metro Vancouver, from 300,000 barrels a day to almost 900,000.

The two pipelines would see more than 600 additional oil tankers a year plying the B.C. coast.

The pipelines would contribute an estimated US$131 billion to Canada’s gross domestic product between 2016 and 2030, according to a University of Calgary study.

Tuesday's legislation is the latest in a long list of changes introduced by the federal government since the Northern Gateway project began to founder two years ago.

The proposals would also allow for the use of chemical dispersants — measures that drew immediate fire from project opponents.

Dispersants are meant to break down oil but Karen Wristen, executive director of the environmental group Living Oceans, said evidence is mounting that they are more toxic than the oil itself.

"The only benefit to dispersants is that they make it difficult to see an oil spill, by breaking it up and mixing it into the water column," said Wristen. "For the oil polluters — and apparently, the government — it's out of sight, out of mind."

Sterritt agreed.

"It's more of a cover-up than a clean-up because dispersant cleans up nothing," he said.

_

Follow @ByDeneMoore on Twitter

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

10 Alternative Horror Movies for Halloween 2014
 
B.C. Muslim Association speaks out on gunman
 
Terror turns triumphal as Parliament unites
ELECTION 2014: Port Alberni relaxes sign bylaw
 
Qualicum Beach man fears for future of big, old tree on the beach
 
LOOKING GOOD: Waterfront focus of city improvement
Federal-tax scam strikes Cowichan
 
Meet Lois Morrow
 
EDITORIAL: No easy road for Kinder Morgan

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 22 edition online now. Browse the archives.